Feb. 22nd, 2019

.

Feb. 22nd, 2019 05:53 pm
nihkee_moolah: (Default)
Sometimes... The price for non-sexualized girls is sexualized boys. And dare I say it's good cause we really do need refreshment sometimes 
nihkee_moolah: (Weird flex)
Look at my previous entry and in the comments to see the how I went off about how Joubert draws girls properly.
Can it be said about boys? Certainly. But, like, they still give off different vibes.

Before I go incoherent, I will flex and say that Joubert didn't draw breasts like That because they weren't what was in the center of the attention (we can't draw the attention away from the precious boys amirite but even in pictures without boys tiddies aren't what catches your eye for the first time). But oh, were all these butts supposed to be the most important thing in this scene? Couldn't it go on without them? With boys drawn at different angles? Couldn't this scene where the boy is getting pulled in have been drawn differently? Obviously it could have been. And yet...
My point is, while he drew girls almost naturally, he overhornified his boys.
I will hopefully go off on it in the comments tomorrow when I wake up. This is Important after all

Profile

nihkee_moolah: (Default)
Corn

April 2021

M T W T F S S
   1234
5678 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 5th, 2026 01:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios