.

[nihkee_moolah]

Sometimes... The price for non-sexualized girls is sexualized boys. And dare I say it's good cause we really do need refreshment sometimes 

Comments

[nihkee_moolah]

And one more thing, here are some examples of girls with minimal to no boobs. One of my least favorite arguments for oversexualizing is that somehow girls with small boobs are anti-feminist cause they completely ignore the presence of girls with big boobs??? (BUT STILL, YOU CAN DRAW GIRLS WITH HUMONGOUS HONKALONKALOOS WITHOUT SEXUALIZING THEM!!! IT IS POSSIBLE! SEE MY ABOVE COMMENT) Or something like that, idk, I will look this one up for direct examples, but like, look at those girls. Even if you flex really really hard, you can't mistake them for boys. Even those on the second example who are wearing pants. Like, you just can't. And yet, they have... like, realistic bodies. Like you can't expect for girls aged 10-14 to have huge ass badonkers and Joubert knew it pretty well.
So kudos for him for doing girls properly.

like I said, his boys, at the other hand, radiate horniness of the artist, but I will talk about it later